Landmark Judgments of the Supreme Court of India: Shaping Constitutional Jurisprudence
By Advocate Avichal Pandey, Allahabad High Court
Introduction
The evolution of constitutional law in India has been profoundly influenced by judicial pronouncements of the Supreme Court. These landmark judgments have not only interpreted the Constitution but have also expanded its scope to meet the changing needs of society. The dynamic nature of law ensures that constitutional values remain vibrant, adaptive, and relevant.
1.Personal Liberty and Expanding Scope of Article 21
The journey of personal liberty under Article 21 reflects a remarkable transformation. In A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Supreme Court adopted a restrictive interpretation, holding that any procedure established by law would suffice for depriving personal liberty.
However, this view was significantly broadened in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, where the Court held that such procedure must be fair, just, and reasonable, thereby introducing substantive due process into Indian jurisprudence.
The controversial ruling in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla during the Emergency, which curtailed habeas corpus rights, was later overruled, reaffirming the primacy of liberty and judicial review.
2.Amendability of Fundamental Rights and Basic Structure Doctrine
The issue of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution witnessed a doctrinal evolution. Initially, in Shankari Prasad and Sajjan Singh, the Court upheld Parliament’s wide amending powers.
This position was reversed in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab, where it was held that Fundamental Rights could not be amended.
The landmark ruling in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala resolved this conflict by propounding the Basic Structure Doctrine, holding that while Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure.
Subsequent cases like Minerva Mills and I.R. Coelho reinforced this doctrine, emphasizing judicial review and constitutional supremacy.
3.Rise of Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
The judiciary expanded access to justice through Public Interest Litigation. Beginning with cases like Mumbai Kamgar Sabha, the Court relaxed procedural technicalities to allow representation of disadvantaged groups.
In Bandhua Mukti Morcha, the Court emphasized that any public-spirited individual could approach the Court for enforcement of fundamental rights of the marginalized, thereby democratizing justice.
4.Human Rights and Dignity Jurisprudence
The Supreme Court has consistently reinforced human dignity as a core constitutional value:-
●Recognition of right to privacy as a fundamental right in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
●Legal recognition of transgender persons as a third gender in NALSA v. Union of India
●Decriminalization of homosexuality in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
●Recognition of right to die with dignity in Common Cause v. Union of India
These judgments signify a progressive and inclusive interpretation of fundamental rights.
5.Gender Justice and Equality
The Court has played a transformative role in advancing gender justice:-
●Shah Bano Case affirmed maintenance rights irrespective of religion
●Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan Case laid down guidelines against workplace sexual harassment
●Shayara Bano Case invalidated triple talaq as unconstitutional
●Joseph Shine Case decriminalized adultery, promoting gender equality
●The Sabarimala judgment Case upheld women’s right to religious entry
These rulings collectively dismantled patriarchal legal barriers.
6.Strengthening Constitutional Democracy
In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, the Court curtailed misuse of Article 356 by introducing judicial review of President’s Rule.
Electoral reforms were advanced through recognition of the Right Not to Vote (NOTA) and disqualification of convicted legislators in Lily Thomas v. Union of India.
7.Independence of Judiciary and Collegium System
The interpretation of judicial appointments evolved through the Judges Cases:-
●The First Judges Case denied primacy to the Chief Justice
●The Second and Third Judges Cases established and strengthened the Collegium System
●The NJAC judgment reaffirmed judicial independence as part of the basic structure
8.Environmental and Social Justice
In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, the Court evolved the principle of Absolute Liability, ensuring strict accountability for hazardous industries.
Similarly, Indra Sawhney v. Union of India laid down important principles on reservations, including the 50% cap and exclusion of the creamy layer.
Conclusion
The landmark judgments of the Supreme Court have been instrumental in shaping India’s constitutional identity. From safeguarding individual liberties to promoting social justice and maintaining institutional balance, the judiciary has emerged as the guardian of constitutional values.
These decisions not only interpret the law but also reflect the evolving aspirations of a democratic society committed to justice, equality, and dignity.
Advocate Avichal Pandey is a practicing counsel before the Allahabad High Court and a legal expert in Constitutional, Criminal, Service, and Matrimonial Matters.
Post a Comment